Saturday, January 16, 2010

US: Supreme Court To Hear Referendum 71 Signature Case, Likely in April

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether the names of Washington voters who sign a petition to put a law on the ballot can be made public. The high court could hear the case of Doe v. Reed as early as April, taking up the fight over the names and addresses of people who signed petitions to put Referendum 71 on last year’s November ballot. That referendum sought to overturn expanded rights for same-sex and elderly heterosexual couples. Supporters of gay rights filed a public records request for the names of everyone who signed the petitions; referendum sponsors objected, saying they feared the signers would be harassed. A few hours after the nation’s high court announced it was adding the case to its schedule, a state legislative committee considered dueling bills spawned by the dispute. One would provide an exemption to the state’s Public Records Act for the names and addresses on initiative or referendum petitions; the other would state categorically that they are public records. Full Story from the Spokesman-Review

Click here for gay marriage resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook - just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you'll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We're also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comments:

Anonymous Mark said...

Heterosexuals don't want gay people to be on a level playing field with them. That is what the Supreme Court decision was about. It was about advantaging heterosexual-only marriage supporters by hiding their true hateful intentions. Heterosexuals want it to look like they are voting against gay people's rights without hate. Heterosexuals don't want the same marriage certificate they have as being equal to one a gay couple has. They want to be perpetually advantaged because they believe they are better than non-heterosexuals.

Heterosexuals in Washington state from the attorney general down to election counters made sure Referendum 71 got on the ballot even though it did not have enough signatures to. The supreme court will rule to hide the signatures because once again they want to advantage heterosexuals. They want heterosexuals to have free reign to carry out voter fraud by forging names on the next anti-gay petition.

January 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home